I saw a bunch of shots of Megan Fox lately on the forums I read. Is something new going on with her? I don’t follow her, don’t much like her look really, but searched a little to find out what’s new and saw this video. It turns out that Megan Fox is not really a person but a CGI. This video below explains it. That shot above, don’t know what that is about but it’s pretty outrageous.
Tags: Megan Fox, Transformers, video
You might also like
Megan Fox likes girls – a lot
I read that Megan Fox was interviewed by Esquire magazine and one of the things she said was "I...
|
Kratae and Alisa car wash show at Transformers opening
The new Transformers movie opened at the Siam Paragon Cineplex and they had a party to celebrate....
|
Aspiring photographer shots of FHM girl Oil
Oil seems to be a favorite of a lot of aspiring photographers since she got a name from her appearance...
|
Don’t flirt with the maid
I read something on the Bangkok Post Forums that was kind of interesting. A foreigner wrote that...
|
8 Responses to “Megan Fox not really human but CGI”
Leave a Reply
Filed Under: Hollywood
January 30th, 2010 at 9:56 pm
You think they could’ve programmed a more agreeable personality.
January 31st, 2010 at 2:22 am
I don’t care if Megan Fox is a clone. She’s HOT !!!!
January 31st, 2010 at 3:33 am
Truly, m’deer, you have wide ranging interests.
January 31st, 2010 at 8:28 am
She’s not a clone, that would be a real person created from the DNA of another person. She’s CGI, a computer generated image, not real at all. At least that’s the claim.
January 31st, 2010 at 8:31 am
Mostly I’m interested in fashion and hotties. Megan is in there. Even though I don’t think she is that hot lots of other people do so it is my duty to report on her.
January 31st, 2010 at 1:35 pm
Megan is not CGI.
Whilst she may not look like most of us mere mortals (with all our faults and lumps and bumps) she is human.
She has appeared in shows other than Transformers, eg “Two and a Half Men”. And weekly TV show budgets do not run to expensive CGI stuff. So what you see is what it is – with good lighting, make-up etc.
January 31st, 2010 at 1:49 pm
I believe you, because if she was CGI I think they would have given her better skin (you can see her bad skin in unretouched photos) and like E. Spitzer said they would have given her a better personality, too.
I think May Pitchanart is the Thai version of Megan Fox. I saw May’s interview on TV and she said “chan pen dara laew” (I’m a star already) when she was asked why she was seen with some of the well known male stars. That reminded me of the interview with Megan when she called herself “a big star”. Those two make the same kind dumb comments when they talk. The main differences are May has better skin and Megan is a better actress.
February 1st, 2010 at 12:35 am
I wish there were multiple Megan Fox clones! :p