She still looks chubby to me – Natalie Davis or Nathalie Davies – do the models just let every magazine take a guess at how to romanize their name? But she is showing more skin in Mars magazine.
So we must look at her, at least in these couple of photos where she poses to make the least of her hips and most of her chest.
You might also like
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
11 Responses to “Natalie Davis shows more skin in Mars”
Leave a Reply
Filed Under: Stars & Models
March 20th, 2010 at 10:09 am
Very HOT!!
March 20th, 2010 at 1:43 pm
She is very cute, and these photographs captures her extra curves very nicely! Is she a luuk-krung?
March 21st, 2010 at 9:10 am
Very nice, Luuk-Krung or not…
March 21st, 2010 at 11:40 am
“She still looks chubby to me” I don’t see it at all, at least as far as her body is concerned. Her arms aren’t toned, but her abs look firm – no hint of a little pot in these shots. There is something about her face that gives a chubby appearance – plump cheeks, her eyes a bit sunken. Maybe it’s just because I’m more used to a high percentage of truly overweight people, but I wouldn’t have thought “chubby” at all.
March 21st, 2010 at 8:33 pm
If it wasn’t because of her cheeks, I won’t call her chubby. She looks chubby to me, especially when she’s smiling like in the second pic. But this is only my personal opinion.
Actually is it okay if the model’s name was miswritten? Not only Natalie-Nathalie, but also Pear-Pare and Aum-Aump.
March 21st, 2010 at 8:37 pm
I was looking at her hips. They shot her from the side, turned to make her look as thin as possible, but still she looks fat on the bottom.
And the name thing bothers me because even the famous dara let every magazine write their name a different way in English. It bugs me because that’s one of my other gigs, doing translations.
March 21st, 2010 at 10:53 pm
I think she’s a cutie and really don’t see her chubby at all.
March 23rd, 2010 at 10:22 am
“…but still she looks fat on the bottom.”
You’re a harsh mistress, Mistress.
I can understand the name thing. I teach at a rather provincial university in a rural part of the country. Chinese students are routinely given “English” names, ostensibly to make it easier for them to socialize, but I think it’s primarily to make it easier for the faculty. Seems terribly “ugly American” to me.
However, I wonder – in your case – whether the subjects have any input at all on the “Romanization” of their names.
March 23rd, 2010 at 10:55 am
Yes, I guess I am being harsh. I get sort of impatient with seeing some models that I don’t think are very attractive keep showing up in the magazines. I wonder, do they really think she is hot? Or is she just hungry for exposure so they can get her to pose for a lot less than someone like Aum so that’s why they shoot her.
The thing about their names, I guess the models don’t care because every magazine romanizes their names differently. English is just decoration on most of those magazines anyway.
March 24th, 2010 at 8:16 am
@AS
First pic? In my opinion I think she looks fat because of her thighs, no? I bought the magazine and saw the pics, but the body parts that caught my attention mostly were her thighs, other than her cheeks. Maybe if she had a slim pair of thighs she would look, umm, slim?
@AS+John
Do Thai and Chinese have rules of how we can romanize the Thai and Chinese characters? I mean like one in Japanese? I still don’t know Japanese but when I was in Japan, I’ve been taught that “tubasa” in Japanese characters will be romanized as “tsubasa”.
And about the names, either the dara just didn’t care about her name or the magazine editors should asked her real name when they had the chance. I mean they took pics of her and didn’t even ask how they could write her name correctly? Oh no… X(
November 20th, 2010 at 1:00 pm
She doesn’t look very hot in person. Very ordinary and certainly not someone that I would pick out of a group of Thai girls and say ‘wow’.
Not sure why there is any interest in Natalie. Uni dropout.