I mean, she’s not hot, so why does she keep getting layouts in the hottie magazines?
The outfit is cute, but look at that face. Ok, so I’m being harsh, but seriously. She actually looks sort of cute in a some of her photos, but she was in a lakorn recently and standing next to some of the Thai dara she looked… how do I say it… out of place.
You might also like
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
6 Responses to “Natalie Davis in Zoo Weekly – why?”
Leave a Reply
Filed Under: Stars & Models
September 13th, 2010 at 8:22 pm
Nice, tight little body… But other than that, where’s my paper bag???
September 13th, 2010 at 8:58 pm
It looks that way as long as she isn’t standing next to one of the Thai actresses. Then she looks pretty chunky.
September 14th, 2010 at 3:28 am
She wouldn’t look chunky. She’d just look normal. You call this chunky? Amazing Thailand…
September 14th, 2010 at 7:19 am
The second shot looks OK – not gorgeous, but quite pretty. And she does have a very nice figure. At least, when she’s the only person in the shot.
There are people who look terrible in stills, but much better in moving pictures. But you’ve seen her in such and still think she’s, er, not beautiful…
Well, lovely skin.
September 14th, 2010 at 7:27 am
Whoa, not!
September 15th, 2010 at 11:53 am
Her face looks like a man’s face with heavy make-up and a wig.
If it wasn’t because of her body and the lingerie, I wouldn’t think it’s her.
I wouldn’t even think it’s a woman. XD
Some of her photos in the past were gorgeous. She has a great body, I’ll give her that. But if I want to admire a woman with farang look, I’d turn to Chompoo. Not that I’m saying her face is ugly, but that’s just not my type.
Besides, I wouldn’t blame anyone who likes her. Even people starved for attention like Pah Tob have fans. Don’t ask me why, I just don’t understand it…