But smaller this time. That last photo set of big cute puppies was pretty interesting but I couldn’t find a name for the model. This model is named Phaeng. Yes that is the correct way to romanize her name, not Pang as Mix magazine did because that is an unaspirated “P” and this model’s nickname is the Thai word for “expensive”.
So it’s an aspirated “P” which we write as “Ph” as in Phuket. Ok, enough being the translation police. On with the photos.
In the two photos with the dog it is the cute little puppy that is definitely the winner and Phaeng really doesn’t look that hot, does she.
But she’s looking pretty hot in the next two photos.
I think there is a lesson there about working with animals. The truth is I’m not sure exactly what that means, just repeating something I heard several times, something about never working with kids and animals because they will upstage you I guess.
You might also like
Everybody loves cute puppies
I think everybody loves cute puppies. I know I do. And I can clearly see that this girl does.
Everybody...
|
Hwang Mee Hi in pink
Some of the forums posters are just crazy about Hwang Mi Hee. They post dozens and dozens of her...
|
Koy in black and white
A quick preview of the photo layout of Koy Ratchawin in Mix magazine. They did black and white and...
|
When they try too hard it becomes annoying
In my last post I was enjoying how amazingly cute some of the race queens are. But there is a dark...
|
February 12th, 2010 at 1:25 am
“n the two photos with the dog it is the cute little puppy that is definitely the winner and Phaeng really doesn’t look that hot, does she.”
I suspect a sizable fraction of the viewers didn’t notice the dog in the first two pictures.
Besides – seriously – looking really sexy in shots involving animals or children could set off censors because of possible morality issues. I mean, imagine the cute little puppy on Phaeng’s abdomen in the third shot – see what I mean? Too questionable for most publications, and – at least in the US – would probably spark a lot of reaction.
February 12th, 2010 at 8:05 am
I agree. Girly dogs in a men’s mag? What were they thinking? In the first pic is that a slip? Because the second has a different skirt? Or was it just bad lighting?
February 13th, 2010 at 2:45 am
Hot puppies, indeed!!!